From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Neurology>
  4. Summary and Comment

High-Dose Immunosuppression for Refractory CIDP?

The intensity of immunosuppression may be more important than the total cumulative dose in effectively treating CIDP.

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is an immune-mediated neuropathy for which treatment with plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin, or corticosteroids usually is beneficial. However, one third of CIDP patients do not respond to these conventional therapies, and many who respond initially relapse and develop substantial disability after several years. Compelling data suggest that both B and T cells mediate the immune attack on peripheral nerve, thus providing a biologic rationale for using more aggressive immunosuppressive regimens.

These researchers report their experience with high-dose cyclophosphamide (200 mg/kg over 4 days) in 4 patients with severe CIDP that was refractory to other therapies. All patients were disabled (Rankin scores of 4 or 5) and had failed numerous trials of standard therapies. Interestingly, 3 patients also had failed to improve after previous treatment with intravenous cyclophosphamide (1 g/m2).

All patients' Medical Research Council strength scores and Rankin disability scores improved; 2 patients improved by 3 Rankin grades. Febrile neutropenia and transient renal insufficiency occurred in 2 patients, and another developed line sepsis, but there was no long-term morbidity or mortality.

Comment: Current therapies for CIDP are inadequate for many patients. In this study, a 70-kg patient would have received 14 g of cyclophosphamide, only slightly more than the "immunomodulating" dose (1 g/m2) of 1.5 to 2.0 g administered as a pulse monthly for 6 months (a regimen that many centers already have adopted empirically). Therefore, the intensity of immunosuppression may be a more relevant factor than the total cumulative dose or the duration of therapy. The benefits of this approach must be weighed against high risks for systemic infection and for other serious complications. The risk-benefit balance may be in favor of high-dose immunosuppression if patients experience sustained remission and discontinue prednisone or other chronic immune (and potentially toxic) treatments.

— Kenneth C. Gorson, MD

Dr. Gorson is Associate Professor of Neurology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston.

Published in Journal Watch Neurology August 22, 2002

Citation(s):

Brannagan TH III et al. High-dose cyclophosphamide without stem-cell rescue for refractory CIDP. Neurology 2002 Jun 25; 58:1856-8.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2002. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.