From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Neurology>
  4. Summary and Comment

Update on Spinal Epidural Abscess

Early diagnosis and treatment are vital.

Rabih O. Darouiche reviews the pathogenesis of bacterial spinal epidural abscess, its clinical features, diagnosis, treatment, common diagnostic and therapeutic hazards, and outcomes.

Spinal epidural abscess generally presents as a hematogenous spread of bacterial infection (most commonly, Staphylococcus aureus). Clinical signs and symptoms are caused either directly by compression or indirectly by ischemia due to thrombophlebitis. Symptoms progress from back pain to nerve root pain to neurologic compromise to paralysis. The most vital diagnostic modality is MRI with intravenous gadolinium. White blood cell counts, tests for inflammatory markers, blood cultures, plain radiographs, and CT scans provide diagnostic confirmation. Management generally consists of surgical decompression and antibiotics. Conservative treatment (antibiotics) usually is reserved for patients with high operative risk, paralysis lasting up to 24 to 36 hours, panspinal infection, or lack of consent to surgery.

Comment: This interesting, concise review of the literature highlights the paucity of analytical studies on the management of spinal epidural abscess. The conclusions therefore are generally based on retrospective observational case series. The article nevertheless is important in emphasizing some important management issues. Darouiche supports early intervention because of the unpredictable and variable rate of progression of neurologic decline and because of the importance of disease stage at intervention in treatment outcome. The author also suggests a role for surgical intervention, even in patients with complete paralysis, to manage the source of sepsis. The article illustrates the need for further evaluation of nonsurgical therapy, as selection bias mars the current literature on this subject. Darouiche concludes by accentuating the need for close monitoring during treatment, as recurrence after initial recovery is not unusual.

— Sagun Tuli, MD, MSc, FRCSc

Dr. Tuli is Spine Neurosurgeon, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and Assistant Professor, Harvard Medical School, Boston.

Published in Journal Watch Neurology January 2, 2007

Citation(s):

Darouiche RO. Spinal epidural abscess. N Engl J Med 2006 Nov 9; 355:2012-20.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2007. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.