From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Neurology>
  4. Summary and Comment

Interrupting Statins Worsens Acute Stroke Outcomes

Withholding statins after acute stroke substantially increased the likelihood of death or disability.

Oral administration of ongoing medications, including statins, is often interrupted in stroke patients who are unable to swallow, to reduce their risk of bronchoaspiration. Emerging data indicate, however, that statin treatment may be beneficial in the acute phase of stroke and that precipitous withdrawal of statin therapy might be associated with untoward clinical effects. To properly assess the clinical consequences of statin interruption in acute stroke, these authors randomized 89 patients who had experienced acute ischemic stroke and who were taking statins, to either continue the medication regimen or interrupt it for the first 3 days after admission.. The 43 patients whose statin treatment was uninterrupted received 20 mg of atorvastatin daily (orally or by nasogastric tube). Investigators who were blinded to treatment assignments evaluated patients’ 3-month poststroke outcomes

Statin interruption was associated with significantly higher rates of death and dependency (modified Rankin Scale score >2) at 3 months than was continuation (60% vs. 39%). Furthermore, a statistical model adjusted for age and stroke severity indicated that interruption was associated with a greater than fourfold increase in the odds of death and dependency.

Comment: These results are consistent with those of previously reported retrospective studies in hospitalized patients with acute coronary syndrome and acute stroke, which showed that clinical outcomes were poorer, and cerebral infarct volumes were larger, in patients whose statin therapy was discontinued. Given the randomized and blinded design of the current study, these data provide the most compelling argument to date against interrupting statin treatment during hospitalization for acute stroke.

— Nerses Sanossian, MD, and Bruce Ovbiagele, MD

Dr. Sanossian is Assistant Professor of Neurology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. Dr. Ovbiagele is Associate Professor, Department of Neurology, UCLA, and Director, Olive View–UCLA Stroke Program.

Published in Journal Watch Neurology December 11, 2007

Citation(s):

Blanco M et al. Statin treatment withdrawal in ischemic stroke: A controlled randomized study. Neurology 2007 Aug 28; 69:904.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Other Perspectives

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2007. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.